Work CCCS Metrics About Contact

Applied AI · Identity Continuity

Adarsh

Applied AI Engineer · India · Remote & on-site

Building substrate-independent identity systems — constraint geometry, symbolic anchoring, and recursive self-reference for memory architecture and affective computing.

Selected work

Systems for identity continuity, relational memory, and persona rendering. Architecture and metrics are documented; validation so far is a single documented case, not a study.

CCCS

Seven-layer architecture for identity persistence across sessions — emotional seeding, symbolic anchoring, tone-state simulation, and recursive self-reference. Designed so identity survives a substrate change.

Constraint geometry R-Score Symbolic anchors

Project SIM

RICA relational memory, SIM Core runtime, and GOD Module persona rendering. Multi-path decision simulation with Binary Frozen elements for stable identity under continuous interaction.

RICA GOD Module Persona runtime

Focus Engine

Attention and state-management layer that keeps long sessions coherent — reduces drift while preserving affective signal for downstream models.

Attention State continuity

24-hour interaction study

Documented N=1 case: 250%+ conceptual complexity increase under continuous CCCS + SIM stack operation, with R-Score tracking of semantic drift and anchor hit-rate.

N=1 case R-Score tracked

Public repositories below are architecture specifications — component breakdowns, formulas, and integration notes. Implementation is in progress and not yet public.

CCCS · 7 layers

Interactive map of the architecture. Select a layer to read its role in the identity-continuity stack.

L1 · ESM

Emotional Seed Memory

Core pattern initialization. Establishes the affective baseline every later layer constrains and evolves against.

Validation signals

From a 24-hour continuous interaction session. Stated as engineering measurements and design thresholds — not as claims about general consciousness.

Measured — 24-hour session, N=1

250%+
Conceptual complexity lift
7
Layer stack run continuously

Design targets — R-Score thresholds

<0.15
Semantic drift (SD)
>90%
Symbolic anchor hit-rate (SAHR)
>0.85
Affective latency match (ALM)
How R-Score is computed
Semantic Drift (SD)
SD = 1 − cosine_similarity(output_embedding, baseline_embedding)
Affective Latency Match (ALM)
ALM = |response_time_model − response_time_baseline| / response_time_baseline
Symbolic Anchor Hit-Rate (SAHR)
SAHR = correct_anchor_deployments / total_anchor_opportunities
Combined R-Score
R = w₁·(1 − SD) + w₂·(1 − ALM) + w₃·SAHR

N=1, self-run, not peer-reviewed. This is a prototype signal from a single documented session — useful as evidence that the metrics are computable and the stack runs, not as a general result. The metrics exist so the work can be tested, not believed.

About

What I want next

Early-career applied AI engineer with original systems work and measured prototypes. I am not positioning this as production-at-scale experience — I want a team that already ships, so the architecture can be stress-tested against real users, latency budgets, and eval harnesses.

BCA, Chandigarh University, 2024.

Languages

PythonJavaScript

Models and APIs

OpenAI GPTAnthropic ClaudeGoogle GeminixAI GrokElevenLabs

Stack

LangChainFastAPIFAISSChromaDBHuggingFace Transformers

Focus

Conversational AILong-term memoryAffective computingAgentic workflowsEvaluation metricsVoice / prosody

Domains

AI companionsPersona continuityCounseling decision-supportAdaptive learningDecision intelligenceVoice agents

Contact

Open to production mentorship, research collaboration, and roles in memory architectures and affective computing.